Time For Change: Is L.A.'S Political Landscape Ready For A Major Shake-Up?

  • By Miles
  • Jan. 31, 2026, 3 p.m.

Scandals Rocking the City of Angels

If there's ever been a moment for Los Angeles to hit pause and rethink its political game, it's now. Three city council members have recently been caught up in corruption scandals, with a fourth awaiting trial. Just a few years ago, a hot mic scandal involving three Latino city councilors revealed racial and homophobic slurs during a conversation about council district gerrymandering, adding more fuel to the fire.

A charter review commission is now exploring reforms that could either be groundbreaking or just more of the same. Los Angeles, a vibrant and diverse metropolis, has long relied on a winner-take-all district election system for its 15-member city council, amplifying turf wars between neighborhoods and communities. As one might say, "It's a formula for political in-fighting and voter alienation."

“If I win the district seat, you and everyone else lose.” This mindset has turned council districts into personal fiefdoms, further fueling corruption, as council members control funds and zoning like a private empire.

Size Matters – The Case for Smaller Districts

Let's envision a sunnier political climate for LA. With a nearly 4 million-strong population and a mere 15 council districts, LA's council districts are the largest of any major U.S. city. Each council member serves an average of 253,000 constituents, a staggering number when compared to Chicago or New York. This unwieldy system has been in place since 1925, leading to ineffective representation and mounting civic frustration.

Imagine a scenario where the number of council seats is increased from 15 to 27. This would reduce the number of constituents per seat to 140,000, bringing the council closer to the people and potentially improving public service and accountability.

Introducing Proportional Ranked Choice Voting

The real game-changer? Proportional ranked choice voting (PRCV). Instead of clinging to the outdated winner-take-all approach, LA could elect its city councilors from nine districts with three seats each using PRCV. This system allows a candidate to win a seat with just 25% of the vote, opening the doors for broader representation.

In such a dynamic setup, different racial and community groups could secure representation reflecting their true numbers. This is a better fit for LA's complex demographic tapestry, where various communities could see their voices amplified. It encourages coalition building and reduces the chances of corruption by distributing power.

Leading the Way to a Brighter Future

Across the nation, around 200 jurisdictions have embraced proportional voting to address minority representation issues. Cities like Portland and New York have already seen success stories with ranked choice voting, paving the way for more inclusive governance.

LA's charter commission faces a golden opportunity to lead the charge into the 21st century with a modern representative democracy. With scandals still casting a shadow over City Hall, it's high time for Los Angeles to turn a new page in its political narrative.

Miles
Author: Miles